<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Roose &#187; web design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertroose.com/category/web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertroose.com</link>
	<description>My Thoughts about Technology, Games and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Designing in HTML: Pro and Cons</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/designing-in-html-pro-and-cons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/designing-in-html-pro-and-cons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of late I have been designing purely with HTML and CSS. Normally I would fire up Photoshop and spend days on making a web design. But since the up rise of CSS3, Responsive web design and Adaptive web design It&#8217;s hard to justify this way of working. Below I list the cons and pro&#8217;s I&#8217;ve encountered. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of late I have been designing purely with <a title="Wikipedia HTML" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML">HTML</a> and <a title="Wikipedia CSS" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Css">CSS</a>. Normally I would fire up <a title="Wikipedia Photoshop" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoshop">Photoshop</a> and spend days on making a web design. But since the up rise of <a title="CSS3 Info" href="http://www.css3.info/">CSS3</a>, <a title="A List Apart: Responsive Web Design" href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/">Responsive web design</a> and <a title="Adaptive Web Design Book" href="http://easy-readers.net/books/adaptive-web-design/">Adaptive web design</a> It&#8217;s hard to justify this way of working. Below I list the cons and pro&#8217;s I&#8217;ve encountered.</p>
<h3>Cons</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>It might limit creativity.</strong> When working in Photoshop you don&#8217;t really think about how you would translate the pixels into HTML and CSS. That&#8217;s why most of the time I would make something and really had to push myself to get the same effect on a working website. Forcing me to develop my HTML and CSS skills. Working directly with HTML and CSS it&#8217;s not likely you will think up of something which is hard to create. This narrows the vision and might limit creativity.</li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s hard for clients to comment on the things that matter. </strong>Because the website looks so real (it&#8217;s already functioning with hovers, menu&#8217;s, etc.) clients tend to comment on trivial things such as a missing disclaimer page. It&#8217;s harder for them to look at it as a design and give critique on used colors, photo&#8217;s, fonts and the positioning of elements.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Pro&#8217;s</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>I&#8217;ts more realistic.</strong> What you see is what you get. Clients can look at it on their mobile and tablet or on different browsers. They can experience the design like their users will in the future. Compared to the old ways (creating a rendered Photoshop JPEG) there is less going back and forth between you and the client about the translation of the design into HTML and CSS.</li>
<li><strong>It&#8217;s faster. </strong>Because you don&#8217;t have to recreate the Photoshop design in HTML and CSS anymore you can skip a step in the process. When a client signs off the design you only have to add a few extra pages or (in my case) you will need to make the design fit for a Content Management System. This can be a real time-saver.</li>
</ul>
<div>So far I&#8217;m really liking this process and I don&#8217;t think I will go back to Photoshop any time soon. How do you design? What are your methods? Share them in the comments!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/designing-in-html-pro-and-cons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of webdesign: Back to the Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/future-of-webdesign-back-to-the-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/future-of-webdesign-back-to-the-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last ten years webdesign has evolved into a very visual matter. With techniques such as Flash, jQuery and HTML5 it is easy to make visual stunning elements disregarding the actual content. The focus is very much on style. The future of webdesign will be the opposite. We will see a trend which will put content above [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last ten years webdesign has evolved into a very visual matter. With techniques such as <a title="Adobe Flash" href="http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer.html">Flash</a>, <a title="jQuery" href="http://jquery.com/">jQuery</a> and <a title="HTML5 Rocks" href="http://www.html5rocks.com/en/">HTML5</a> it is easy to make visual stunning elements disregarding the actual content. The focus is very much on style. The future of webdesign will be the opposite. We will see a trend which will put content above style. Here is why:</p>
<ul>
<li>Flash is dead: With Google not indexing Flash sites, Apple denying it&#8217;s existence on their products and HTML5 being the Google-friendly alternative, it is all going downhill for Flash.</li>
<li>Hovers do not work on a tablet or mobile phone: The rise of the mobile devices is unstoppable. We need to tailor or sites to make them work perfectly on any devices. Meaning hovers will be a thing of the past because you can not hover on a smartphone or tablet. So no more fancy jQuery hover pop-up thingies.</li>
<li>Tiny fonts are a thing of the past: 10 to 12px is very small. <a title="16 Pixels advocate" href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/10/07/16-pixels-body-copy-anything-less-costly-mistake/">Read this great article</a> why everything should be 16px.</li>
<li>Websites need to be fast: Mobile visitors have lower bandwidth so you can not load a gazillion javascript files to make it all look pretty. Also Google will rank you higher when you speed up your site.</li>
</ul>
<div>To summarize: No more Flash or moving jQuery sliders. No more graphic heavy bloated sites but small and fast sites with big fonts. So we web designers need to get creative. We are going back to basic.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/future-of-webdesign-back-to-the-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>28 Things I&#8217;ve Learned from &#8216;Convert!&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/28-things-ive-learned-from-convert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/28-things-ive-learned-from-convert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas urged me to read &#8216;Convert! Designing Web Sites to Increase Traffic and Conversion&#8216;. I was skeptic at first but after reading I&#8217;m convinced this is one of the best Web design books out there. Here are 28 things I&#8217;ve learned from reading it: Research your keywords. They have to be of high relevance, give you high [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Thomas van Eldijk Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/#!/thomasvaneldijk">Thomas</a> urged me to read &#8216;<a title="Convert! Link to Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Convert-Designing-Increase-Traffic-Conversion/dp/0470616334">Convert! Designing Web Sites to Increase Traffic and Conversion</a>&#8216;. I was skeptic at first but after reading I&#8217;m convinced this is one of the best Web design books out there. Here are 28 things I&#8217;ve learned from reading it:</p>
<ol>
<li>Research your keywords. They have to be of high relevance, give you high traffic and have low competition.</li>
<li>Use <a title="Market Samurai: Research your keywords" href="http://www.marketsamurai.com/">Market Samurai</a>. This will give you insights in the information summed up in point 1.</li>
<li>Make sure you keywords density is between 2% and 4% on a page.</li>
<li>Explore alternative link building activities such as comments and forums.</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t talk about features, talk about benefits. What&#8217;s in it for your visitor?</li>
<li>There are six levels of awareness:<br />
0. People don&#8217;t have the problem you are offering a solution for.<br />
1. People have the problem but don&#8217;t know there is a solution.<br />
2. People know there is a solution, but they don&#8217;t know your solution.<br />
3.  People know your solution but are not convinced.<br />
4. People are convinced by your solution but are not ready to commit.<br />
5. People are convinced and are willing to use/try your solution.</li>
<li>Write content for the level of awareness you think will attract the most potential buyers/is the biggest market.</li>
<li>Use the <a title="Text Mechanic: Permutation Genartor" href="http://textmechanic.com/Permutation-Generator.html">Permutation Generator</a> to create different strings of keywords.</li>
<li>Think out of the box when researching keywords. You never know for sure what people are searching for. Try to find an untapped market.</li>
<li>Set up your funnels in <a title="Google Analytics" href="http://www.google.com/analytics/">Google Analytics</a> so you know where your website is &#8216;leaking&#8217; visitors.</li>
<li>The Tree Elements of Conversion are: Get their attention, Keep them Engaged and Call them to Action.</li>
<li>Headlines should confirm where you are and it should grab your interest and give you a reason to look further.</li>
<li>Your headline should suggest value to the reader.</li>
<li>Use you-oriented language. Your content shouldn&#8217;t be about &#8216;Us&#8217; but about &#8216;You&#8217; (the visitor).</li>
<li>Write for the undecided prospect. Those who are determined to go through to the next step always will. Those who are not going to proceed no matter what happens, never will. Focus on the undecided.</li>
<li>Promise to solve a problem</li>
<li>It&#8217;s about benefits, not about features.</li>
<li>Squint your eyes when you look at your website. Where is the main focus? It should be on the call the actions.</li>
<li>Use contrast, boldness, space, size, color and 3D effects to emphasize your call to actions.</li>
<li>Take away all the text on your page. Do the graphics still convey what you are about?</li>
<li>Content over style.</li>
<li>Resolve concerns.</li>
<li>Show evidence: use customer quotes or awards to build trust.</li>
<li>Make it easy for visitors to call to action. Give them lots of options to interact with the website.</li>
<li>Calls to action should be obvious, bold and direct.</li>
<li>Inject urgency. Give visitors the feeling the offer could end any moment.</li>
<li>Reverse engineer the competition. How did they get their back-links?</li>
<li>Use <a title="Google Website Optimizer" href="http://www.google.com/websiteoptimizer">Google Website Optimizer</a> to do A/B testing or Multivariate test.</li>
</ol>
<div>Everything described above is explained in detail in the book. So buy the book! It&#8217;s really worth it.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/28-things-ive-learned-from-convert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get a dribbble invite</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/how-to-get-a-dribbble-invite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/how-to-get-a-dribbble-invite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/uncategorized/how-to-obtain-a-dribbble-invite/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dribbble is the new hot online hangout for an aspiring designer, but it is closed and you need an invite to get in. This how I got one: Make a dribbble account and list as a prospect Make sure your portfolio is up to date and looking OK. It doesn`t have to be the best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dribbble is the new hot online hangout for an aspiring designer, but it is closed and you need an invite to get in. This how I got one:</p>
<ol>
<li>Make a <a title="Sign up for Dribbble" href="http://dribbble.com/signup">dribbble account</a> and list as a prospect</li>
<li>Make sure your portfolio is up to date and looking OK. It doesn`t have to be the best thing ever displayed on the interwebs but get it tidy and passable.</li>
<li>Go to the <a title="Twitter Search" href="http://twitter.com/#!/search-home">twitter search</a> and search for <a title="Twitter Search Dribbble invite" href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/dribbble%20invite">dribbble invite</a>. Login to <a title="Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/">twitter</a> (if you don`t have a twitter account, get one) and save this search. Now you see people requesting and offering invites.</li>
<li>When someone offers an invite start by following this person.</li>
<li>Reply to their tweet with a kind message asking to be considerd for the invite. Include a link to your dribbble profile and your portfolio! Make it easy for the kind soul to glance over your portfolio and invite you straight from your profile.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you`re lucky you are in. If not go back to step four.</p>
<p><strong>Extra:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Speed is everything so you have to be quick when someone offers an invite. I found the best way to do this was to install <a title="Tweetdeck" href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/">tweetdeck</a>. You can add the saved twitter search from step three into a column to your tweetdeck. If you set the notifications you get a pop-up everytime someone offers an invite and you are able to respond immediately.</li>
<li>Don`t waste your time with people having contests over invites. They are not worth the hassle. If your portfolio is not convincing enough: start working on it!</li>
</ul>
<p>It took me about three days and twenty twitter replies to get invited. Good luck and let me know how it went in the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/how-to-get-a-dribbble-invite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If and How to use Lorem Ipsum</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/if-and-how-to-use-lorem-ipsum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/if-and-how-to-use-lorem-ipsum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lorum Ipsum is a bit of text (generated by websites such as www.lipsum.com) used by designer in mock-ups as placeholders for text. There has been a discussion of late whether or not to use Lorum Ipsum. So here are my two cents: Use Lorum Ipsum but only to fill the gaps! As a designer you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorum Ipsum is a bit of text (generated by websites such as <a title="Lipsum" href="http://www.lipsum.com" target="_blank">www.lipsum.com</a>) used by designer in mock-ups as placeholders for text. There has been a <a title="Stop using Lorem Ipsum!" href="http://www.netmagazine.com/opinions/stop-using-lorem-ipsum" target="_blank">discussion</a> of late whether or not to use Lorum Ipsum. So here are my two cents:</p>
<p>Use Lorum Ipsum but only to fill the gaps! As a designer you have to think about where to place what content. It is one of the most important tasks as a designer! Create meaningful headers such as &#8216;Latest News&#8217; or &#8216;Upcoming Events&#8217; to indicate what kind of content is supposed to be in that specific area. I see no harm in using Lorem Ipsum to fill these content area&#8217;s with placeholder text as long as it is clear what kind of content is supposed to be there.</p>
<p>We are designers. Not copy-writers and no information architects. Because of our experience we know where to place content so it is creates a pleasant experience for the user. But don&#8217;t waste time on the details, it&#8217;s not our task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/if-and-how-to-use-lorem-ipsum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 things I&#8217;ve learned after 5 years in the industry</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/5-things-ive-learned-after-5-years-in-the-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/5-things-ive-learned-after-5-years-in-the-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 2011 I&#8217;ve been working in the webdesign industry for more than five years. I want to share five lessons I&#8217;ve learned in those five years: 1. Underpromise and overachieve It is fairly simple: When a client asks you when something is done take the date when you think it&#8217;s done, add a week and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May 2011 I&#8217;ve been working in the webdesign industry for more than five years. I want to share five lessons I&#8217;ve learned in those five years:</p>
<p><strong>1. Underpromise and overachieve</strong><br />
It is fairly simple: When a client asks you when something is done take the date when you think it&#8217;s done, add a week and communicate this date to the client. For example: you think something will be done in a week. Tell your client it will be done in two weeks. Your client expects you to deliver in two weeks but when you deliver within a week your client will be extra pleased. It works the other way as well. Imagine you told the client it would take a week and you deliver one day after this deadline. Result: your client will be pissed off because you are too late. So what would you rather have?</p>
<p><strong>2. Little money, big problems<br />
</strong>When a client tells you he has little money to spend on the project at the moment but he promises a big pot of gold at the end of the rainbow when things take off, alarm bells should be ringing. Clients with little money to spend are the biggest pain in the ass. Because they have little to spend they want to spend it well and will fuss about almost everything. Try to avoid these clients, cause in the end they will only cost you.</p>
<p><strong>3. 9 to 5 is an unnecessary bitch!</strong><br />
9 to 5 is an absolute joke. Nobody works 8 straight hours a day. So why do we keep confining people to these rules which have their origin in the Industrial age? People need to have the freedom to make their own schedule. In the end it&#8217;s all about achievements. Who cares if you do your work in 10 minutes or 10 hours? As long as it gets done! More about this subject in this <a title="Why Work Sucks and how to fix it." href="http://www.amazon.com/Why-Work-Sucks-How-Joke/dp/1591842034" target="_blank">great book</a>.</p>
<p><strong>4. OK is good enough<br />
</strong>Being a perfectionist is being stupid. You need a healthy balance between time spend on a project and meeting a deadline. Sometimes you just need to let it go and tell yourself it might not be perfect but it&#8217;s OK. It&#8217;s the best you could do within the time schedule. Don&#8217;t lose yourself in the details.</p>
<p><strong>5. It&#8217;s easy to become an expert</strong><br />
Want to become an expert on a subject? Easy: just read blogs and sites about this subject every day and eventually you will become an expert. You&#8217;ll be one of the few people actually taking the effort to keep yourself up to date. It&#8217;s easy and fun (granted you are interested in chosen subject). And if you want to take it a step further just start a blog or website about the subject. This is how I became and expert on Android and was invited to two different major Dutch radio stations to talk about Android.</p>
<p>Take from this advice what you want. Have something to add? Let me know in the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/5-things-ive-learned-after-5-years-in-the-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the iPad kill the website?</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/will-the-ipad-kill-the-purpose-of-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/will-the-ipad-kill-the-purpose-of-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the introduction of the iPad a new device is added into our (already heavy) backpack. Is this device going to change the future of websites? Are websites doomed as claimed by Boris in his post on thenextweb.com? Boris thinks websites will be replaced by Apps. I beg to differ. I don&#8217;t think it is about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the introduction of the <a title="iPad" href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/" target="_blank">iPad</a> a new device is added into our (already heavy) backpack. Is this device going to change the future of websites? Are websites doomed as claimed by <a title="Boris of the Next Web" href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/author/boris/" target="_blank">Boris</a> in <a title="Death of the website" href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/author/boris/" target="_self">his post on thenextweb.com</a>? Boris thinks websites will be replaced by Apps. I beg to differ. I don&#8217;t think it is about the device, the App or the website. I thinks it&#8217;s about data and services. I don&#8217;t care if I have to use an App or a website as long as I get to do the things I want to do WHERE I want to do them. For example if I want to check <a title="The Internet Movie Database" href="http://www.imdb.com" target="_blank">IMDB</a> on my phone I would like to use an App, but if I want to check it on my laptop I would rather use the website. The App or website is just a tool, not the goal. The goal is to get information as quickly as possible.</p>
<p>More likely future websites will have added layers enabling Voice Control or simplified touch controls. Making websites easier to use on the iPad and future iPad competitors without compromising experience for users viewing the website in an ordinary browser. Because it will take a very long time for the iPad (or any similair iPad-like device) to become a household product. Take a look at the penitration of smartphones. In 2009 only <a title="Smartphone penetration" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/comscore-smartphone-penetration-marketshare-feb-2010.jpg" target="_blank">17%</a> of every mobile phone was a smartphone. Offering your data and services merely through Apps won&#8217;t cut it! You still need a website to please the biggest share of users. Websites are not dead, they are ready for their second life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/will-the-ipad-kill-the-purpose-of-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outliers: How talent is overrated</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/books/outliers-how-talent-is-overrated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/books/outliers-how-talent-is-overrated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 10:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his latest book Malcom Gladwell claims that talent doesn&#8217;t make one successful. It&#8217;s more about practice and being lucky. He makes his point with insightful examples which can hold their claim. The Beatles are one example. They were lucky enough to be invited to play in Hamburg, Germany in 1960. In Hamburg they played [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="image left" title="Malcom Gladwell" src="http://www.robertroose.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/malcom_gladwell.jpg" alt="Malcom Gladwell" width="150" height="131" />In his <a title="Outliers on Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Outliers-Story-Success-Malcolm-Gladwell/dp/0316017922" target="_blank">latest book</a> <a title="Website Malcom Gladwell" href="http://www.gladwell.com/" target="_blank">Malcom Gladwell </a>claims that talent doesn&#8217;t make one successful. It&#8217;s more about practice and being lucky. He makes his point with insightful examples which can hold their claim. <a title="The Beatles Wikipedia page." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles" target="_blank">The Beatles</a> are one example. They were lucky enough to be invited to play in Hamburg, Germany in 1960. In Hamburg they played seven days a week for eight hours straight! In those trips they made to Hamburg they played twelve hundred times together which is quite unique. So you can conclude that The Beatles had a lot of practice.</p>
<p>According to Gladwell it comes down the the 10.000 hour rule.  If you practice something for 10.000 hours you&#8217;re bound to get good at it. Outliers: The Story of Succes is loaded with great examples which demonstrate this 10.000 hour rule.</p>
<p><strong>How does this 10.000 hours of practice apply to a designer?</strong><br />
Dee Barizo made a <a title="How to Practice Effectively to Improve Your Skills" href="http://www.devlounge.net/strategy/practice-effectively-to-improve-skills" target="_blank">blog post</a> about how to practice as a designer. He gives some great pointers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Practice is not enough, you need to improve. Doing the same thing over and over again won&#8217;t help you unless you improve.</li>
<li>Seek feedback. Without feedback it&#8217;s hard to determine if you improve.</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t overdo it. Your brain can handle so much, straining it won&#8217;t do you any good.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, stop reading this blog and start practicing!</p>
<p>P.S: Dee Barizo talks about another book <a title="Amazon Talent is Overrated" href="http://www.amazon.com/Talent-Overrated-Separates-World-Class-Performers/dp/1591842247" target="_blank">Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin</a>. I haven&#8217;t read it but it looks very similar to Outliers. Fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/books/outliers-how-talent-is-overrated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cross Browser testing: 4 options, 1 answer.</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/cross-browser-testing-4-options-1-answer-on-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/cross-browser-testing-4-options-1-answer-on-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As web designers we have the difficult task to make sure a website looks nice in all sorts of browsers.With the release of Internet Explorer 8, Google Chrome and Safari slightly but surely taking a bigger piece of the browser pie we have to check our creations in at least 6 different browsers (including Internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As web designers we have the difficult task to make sure a website looks nice in all sorts of browsers.With the release of <a title="Internet Explorer 8" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/internet-explorer/default.aspx">Internet Explorer 8</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google Chrome</a> and <a title="W3C browsers stats. Safari is getting more browser market share." href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp">Safari slightly but surely taking a bigger piece of the browser pie</a> we have to check our creations in at least 6 different browsers (including Internet Explorer 6, Internet Explorer 7 and Firefox).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked at four different ways to check websites in several browsers in order to find the holy grail of cross browser testing. I&#8217;ve researched four different options and found one option to be the best. Read on if you want to know whose the winner. (Please take note that I&#8217;m talking about cross browser checking on a Windows machine. Some information might still be valuable for Mac users though.)</p>
<h1>1. Litmus</h1>
<p><a href="http://litmusapp.com"><img class="image left" title="litmus" src="http://www.robertroose.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/litmus.jpg" alt="Litmus" width="180" height="76" /></a>Litmus in a web application is which let you test a website by giving it the URL. It will return screenshots from up to 23 major browsers (including the six above)! So theoretically you can test your website in all major browsers. But the problem is you only get a screenshot. So you can&#8217;t test the interaction of drop down menu&#8217;s or forms, which is a big miss.</p>
<p><strong>Pro<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Web based so no need to install something on your PC.</li>
<li>Covers 23 different browsers.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Con</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Free version only allows testing on two browsers. (Else it will set you back for at least $24 a day or $49 a month)</li>
<li>You only get to see screenshots so you can&#8217;t test any interaction.</li>
</ul>
<h1>2. Microsoft Expression Web SuperPreview</h1>
<p><img class="image left" title="microsoft" src="http://www.robertroose.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/microsoft.jpg" alt="microsoft" width="180" height="76" />&#8216;Wow, it&#8217;s got SUPER in the title so it HAS to be SUPER right?&#8217;. Not really. <a title="Download SuperPreview" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=8e6ac106-525d-45d0-84db-dccff3fae677&amp;displaylang=en">SuperPreview</a> lets you view your website in Internet Explorer 6, Internet Explorer 7, and when installed, Internet Explorer 8. It has great features like overlaying the IE6 version over the IE7 version or you can place them side by side so it&#8217;s easier to track differences. But it also has great disadvantages. It&#8217;s not possible to click links or test interaction (drop down menu or forms) and there is no way to use tools such as the <a title="Internet Explorer Toolbar" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=e59c3964-672d-4511-bb3e-2d5e1db91038&amp;displaylang=en">Internet Explorer Developer Toolbar</a> which make it easier to solve the problems. But the biggest problem is that the rendering engine isn&#8217;t working correctly! There were some major differences in the rendering with Superpreview compared to the rendering of a native Internet Explorer 7. Which renders (no pun intended) Superpreview useless. It&#8217;s still in a BETA stage so hopefully they can fix these problems, maybe then it would be a great app but for now it&#8217;s still lacking.</p>
<p><strong>Pro<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s free (at least for now)</li>
<li>Easy to track differences</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Con</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Not easy to solve problems (no support for Internet Explorer Toolbar)</li>
<li>Only displays Internet Explorer versions. No Firefox, Chrome or any other non-Microsoft product.</li>
<li>Unable to test interactions such as drop down menu&#8217;s or forms.</li>
<li>Rendering engine is seriously lacking.</li>
</ul>
<h1>3. IETester</h1>
<p><a title="IETester" href="http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" target="_blank">lETester</a> is a webbrowser which enables the user to open tabs using different Internet Explorer rendering engines. In the latest alpha version you can test websites with Internet Explorer 5.5, 6, 7 and 8! You can click links, use forms and test drop downs just like a normal website.  A great tool but the only thing lacking is the Internet Explorer Developer Toolbar making it easier to track down and solve problems.</p>
<p><strong>Pro<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Enables testing for Internet Explorer 5.5, 6, 7 and 8.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s possbile to test interaction such as clicking links, filling out forms and functioning of drop down menus.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Con<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Not possible to use the Internet Explorer Developer Toolbar.</li>
</ul>
<h1>4. The Answer: Using Virtual PCs</h1>
<p><a title="Microsoft Virtual PC" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=04d26402-3199-48a3-afa2-2dc0b40a73b6&amp;DisplayLang=en" target="_blank">Virtual PC</a> is an application developed by Microsoft. With Virtual PC you can simulate a virtual desktop PC with a Windows operating system of your choosing. Using <a title="Virtual Hard Disks" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EF&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">Virtual Hard disks</a> you can create different PCs with different browsers.  So for example you can create a Virtual PC running Internet Explorer 6, Chrome and <a title="Safari for Windows" href="http://www.apple.com/safari/download/" target="_blank">Safari (for Windows)</a>. Another Virtual PC can run on Internet Explorer 7 and another can be used for testing Internet Explorer 8.  Testing in an environment which is an exact copy of the environment of the user is a big plus! You can test all the interaction and use the Internet Explorer Developer Toolbar to iron out those last bugs. Setting everything up can be a hassle but it&#8217;s worth it.</p>
<p><strong>Pro<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Testing browser in the same environment as the user.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s possbile to test interaction such as clicking links, filling out forms and functioning of drop down menus.</li>
<li>The ability to use the Internet Explorer Developer Toolbar.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Con<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s a hassle to set up.</li>
<li>You have to maintain the Virtual Hard Disks as they tend to expire after a certain date.</li>
</ul>
<p>As you can see testing for different browser can be a bitch but in a way you get a great sense of achievement when your website is running smoothly in all those different browsers. Do you have a better way to test websites in different browsers? Let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/cross-browser-testing-4-options-1-answer-on-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to do when a client disagrees</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/what-to-do-when-a-client-disagrees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/what-to-do-when-a-client-disagrees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[self improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a web designer you&#8217;ve probably been in a situation where a client has an idea about his or her website but you, as a web designer, know this idea will end up in a train wreck. Some examples: “Our brochure has the logo on the bottom so it has to be the same on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a web designer you&#8217;ve probably been in a situation where a client has an idea about his or her website but you, as a web designer, know this idea will end up in a train wreck. Some examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>“Our brochure has the logo on the bottom so it has to be the same on our website!”</li>
<li>“Our corporate colours are green, brown, yellow, purple and red. Could you please put them in as a background?”</li>
<li>“We want a 15 minute long flash animation in front of our website. No need for a skip button, people will love this animation!”</li>
</ul>
<p>But don&#8217;t blame the client just because he or she is lacking the experience! You are the web designer so you have to warn your client. If you don&#8217;t mention it, because you think client is always king, you will end up with a dissatisfied client. The project turns out to be a disaster and nobody warned him or her. And guess who gets the blame.</p>
<p>Here are 5 things you can do when you happen to be in this situation:</p>
<ol>
<li>Tell your client that you&#8217;ve designed hundreds of websites and that his idea is rather unusual and that your advice as a designer is to drop it.</li>
<li>Show your client studies which show that the idea he or she is having is not working in the world wide web. (I know he is an internet dinosaur but Jakob Nielsen has done some<a title="Great usability studies by Jakob Nielsen" href="http://www.useit.com/"> great studies </a>which help convincing your client)</li>
<li>Go along and tell the client that the idea is unusual but would make for a great experiment. Make amends and tell them to test it at home with his or her friends and family to see if it works.</li>
<li>Be blunt and tell the client it&#8217;s a bad idea. You understand that the client is king but making these changes and putting it all back when it doesn&#8217;t work will cost them a lot of extra money.</li>
<li>If you are really against the idea you can always refuse to make the changes. Tell the client you don&#8217;t want to make the changes because in the end it will make your client and you unhappy. You give the client all the project files so he or she can go to another web designer and you keep the good relationship with the client.</li>
</ol>
<p>Have you been in this situation and have another tip? Please share!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/what-to-do-when-a-client-disagrees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

