<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Roose &#187; web applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertroose.com/category/web-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertroose.com</link>
	<description>My Thoughts about Technology, Games and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to get a dribbble invite</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/how-to-get-a-dribbble-invite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/how-to-get-a-dribbble-invite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/uncategorized/how-to-obtain-a-dribbble-invite/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dribbble is the new hot online hangout for an aspiring designer, but it is closed and you need an invite to get in. This how I got one: Make a dribbble account and list as a prospect Make sure your portfolio is up to date and looking OK. It doesn`t have to be the best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dribbble is the new hot online hangout for an aspiring designer, but it is closed and you need an invite to get in. This how I got one:</p>
<ol>
<li>Make a <a title="Sign up for Dribbble" href="http://dribbble.com/signup">dribbble account</a> and list as a prospect</li>
<li>Make sure your portfolio is up to date and looking OK. It doesn`t have to be the best thing ever displayed on the interwebs but get it tidy and passable.</li>
<li>Go to the <a title="Twitter Search" href="http://twitter.com/#!/search-home">twitter search</a> and search for <a title="Twitter Search Dribbble invite" href="http://twitter.com/#!/search/dribbble%20invite">dribbble invite</a>. Login to <a title="Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/">twitter</a> (if you don`t have a twitter account, get one) and save this search. Now you see people requesting and offering invites.</li>
<li>When someone offers an invite start by following this person.</li>
<li>Reply to their tweet with a kind message asking to be considerd for the invite. Include a link to your dribbble profile and your portfolio! Make it easy for the kind soul to glance over your portfolio and invite you straight from your profile.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you`re lucky you are in. If not go back to step four.</p>
<p><strong>Extra:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Speed is everything so you have to be quick when someone offers an invite. I found the best way to do this was to install <a title="Tweetdeck" href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/">tweetdeck</a>. You can add the saved twitter search from step three into a column to your tweetdeck. If you set the notifications you get a pop-up everytime someone offers an invite and you are able to respond immediately.</li>
<li>Don`t waste your time with people having contests over invites. They are not worth the hassle. If your portfolio is not convincing enough: start working on it!</li>
</ul>
<p>It took me about three days and twenty twitter replies to get invited. Good luck and let me know how it went in the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/how-to-get-a-dribbble-invite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The App is dead</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-app-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-app-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a year ago the Wired magazine had a fluorescent orange cover with big bold black letters claiming the web is dead. The cover article explained that surfing the web has declined the last few years. More and more people are using apps to consume content. I think we will see this flip back once [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.robertroose.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/app-is-dead.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-431" title="app-is-dead" src="http://www.robertroose.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/app-is-dead.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="167" /></a>About a year ago the Wired magazine had a fluorescent orange cover with big bold black letters claiming <a title="The Web is Dead" href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/ff_webrip/all/1" target="_blank">the web is dead</a>. The cover article explained that surfing the web has declined the last few years. More and more people are using apps to consume content. I think we will see this flip back once more. Apps will be a thing of the past and the (mobile) web will rise aigan. Here is why:</p>
<p>1. Developers are sick of the Apple App store. Months of developing can go straight into the waste basket when Apple decides your app is <a title="App Store Guidelines" href="http://developer.apple.com/appstore/guidelines.html" target="_blank">not suitable</a> for the App store. Also the <a title="The Next Web Apple App Store subscriptions Fees" href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/02/15/subscriptions-arrive-in-the-app-store/" target="_blank">subscription based fees Apple</a> is pressing on publishers won&#8217;t help the popularity of the App store.</p>
<p>2. <a title="ZDNet Android Fragmentation Article" href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/androids-biggest-worry-fragmentation/8022" target="_blank">Fragmentation</a> (a big problem with Android Apps). Not everyone Android phone has the system requirements to run the latest version of Android. Meaning older phones running older Android versions. This makes it hard for a developer to keep his app up to date for all the different versions.</p>
<p>3. New uses for existing technologies, such as <a title="HTML5 Rocks" href="http://www.html5rocks.com/en/" target="_blank">HTML5</a> and <a title="Responsive Webdesign" href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/" target="_blank">Responsive webdesign</a>, to create compelling online experiences. With these technologies it is easy to create a website which works on every device and screen size.</p>
<p>In the future we will see developers bypassing apps and app stores to create just one centralized web app which plays nice with all modern devices. This shift is already visible with Facebook <a title="TechCrunch Article about Facebook Project Spartan" href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/15/facebook-project-spartan/" target="_blank">creating it&#8217;s own web app platform</a>, they don&#8217;t feel like bowing down to the App store overlords.</p>
<p>In the end the demise of the app will be a lot easier for the developer freeing up time to innovate instead of troubling with App store dictators or fiddling with backwards compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-app-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future is Boring</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-future-is-boring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-future-is-boring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last decade has brought us some amazing technologies and web apps. Starting with Google, a way to find information on the web we have never seen before! Then came Wikipedia, collective sharing of knowledge all around the world. Followed by social networks such as Facebook, a revolutionary tool to connect to your social networks. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last decade has brought us some amazing technologies and web apps. Starting with <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>, a way to find information on the web we have never seen before! Then came <a title="Wikipedia" href="http://www.wikipedia.org" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>, collective sharing of knowledge all around the world. Followed by social networks such as <a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, a revolutionary tool to connect to your social networks. The rise of the mobile web soon followed with <a title="Android" href="http://www.android.com/" target="_blank">Android</a> and the <a title="iPhone" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" target="_blank">iPhone</a>.</p>
<p>And then it became less exciting. We got <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> which is OK but not mind blowing. <a title="Foursquare" href="http://www.foursquare.com" target="_blank">Foursquare</a>&#8230; share where you are and&#8230; right, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to me (yet). And the big thing this year is <a title="Groupon" href="http://www.groupon.com" target="_blank">Groupon</a>. Groupon is nothing more than a coupon website! How more boring can it be? It&#8217;s like we&#8217;ve teleported five decades where everybody still clipped the coupons out of the local newspaper! Of course I understand it&#8217;s probably a huge hit (mainly because it&#8217;s one of the few sites actually found a working financial model) but you can hardly call it a revolution. It doesn&#8217;t move me. It feels like I&#8217;m chewing on the same piece of gum the last few years&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for something spectacular! <a title="Fly Nanon" href="http://www.flynano.com/" target="_blank">Flying Cars</a> anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-future-is-boring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The value of Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/the-value-of-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/the-value-of-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 12:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every time a new technology is introduced the majority of the people are skeptical. How can we use this and do we really need this? I remember ten years ago when the mobile phone became populair. I also remember me being against it. I despised guys or girls showing off their new mobile phones and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time a new technology is introduced the majority of the people are skeptical. How can we use this and do we really need this? I remember ten years ago when the mobile phone became populair. I also remember me being against it. I despised guys or girls showing off their new mobile phones and 8-bit ringtones. I still hate the ringtones but I&#8217;m a vivid smartphone user. Back then I just couldn&#8217;t see the advantages and now I can&#8217;t live without it. The same is happening to Twitter. How can a service which limits you to 140 characters a post be of any value? It&#8217;s looks like a tool for exhibitionists wanting to vent their whole life. Slowly but surely we come to see what Twitter is really capable of. This became clear to me last week. I got a call from my girlfriend telling me that a colleague of her was stranded on the Utrecht Central train station because of a bomb threat. I had to travel to Utrecht that day so I checked the biggest Dutch news website (<a title="Dutch News website" href="http://www.nu.nl" target="_blank">nu.nl</a>) to see if there were any reports. Nothing. A search on Google also returned irrelevant results. I went to <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">twitter.com</a> and typed in &#8220;Utrecht&#8221; in the big search box and instantly I got all the information I wanted. Twitter users posting updates about the bomb threat were in abundance. Every second 50 new bits of information were added. I got to see pictures taken with mobile phones of the secluded area&#8217;s. I got the latest updates on what police officers were telling the public. This is the way citizen journalism works. The hive mind gave me a lot of information very quickly. That beings said it is important to be careful with the information being posted on Twitter. The facts are not checked and the information may be false which, for instance, can lead to <a title="Johnny Depp being declared dead on Twitter" href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Technology/Johnny-Depp-Is-The-Victim-Of-Internet-Hoax-Claiming-He-Was-Killed-In-A-Car-Crash/Article/201001415535854" target="_blank">celebrities being declared dead</a> who are still much alive. Even Though Twitter is proving to be very valuable for citizen journalism and journalism as a whole. Next time I want to be updated on the latest information of an event I know where I&#8217;m going: Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/the-value-of-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Start of a new War: Google vs Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/start-of-a-new-search-engine-war-google-vs-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/start-of-a-new-search-engine-war-google-vs-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once there was a war between the search engines. We all know who the won that war: Google. We can hardly remember what we used before Google (Altavista? Yahoo?). A new war is raging. Facebook is stepping up and is putting the pressure on Google. But it&#8217;s Google throwing the first punch. Last week a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once there was a war between the search engines. We all know who the won that war: Google. We can hardly remember what we used before Google (<a title="Altavista" href="http://www.altavista.com/" target="_blank">Altavista</a>? <a title="Yahoo" href="http://www.yahoo.com" target="_blank">Yahoo</a>?). A new war is raging. Facebook is stepping up and is <a title="Facebook putting the pressure on Google" href="http://gigaom.com/2010/04/20/facebook-takes-over-the-web/" target="_blank">putting the pressure</a> on Google. But it&#8217;s Google throwing the first punch.</p>
<p>Last week a lot of <a title="Google Software Engineers deactivated their Facebook accounts" href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/04/23/privacy-issues-google-engineers-leaving-facebook-in-droves/" target="_blank">Google  Software Engineers deactivated their Facebook accounts</a>. This exodus started because of to the announcement on Facebook&#8217;s F8 conference concerning the change in privacy settings. Facebook is opening up to third party sites (such as <a title="Yelp" href="http://www.yelp.com/" target="_blank">Yelp</a>) to make your surfing a more personal experience. This move by Google&#8217;s employees is interesting because the whole things looks orchestrated. Is this a spontaneous reaction or were these Google workers encouraged?</p>
<p>The decision by Facebook to open up is making the social website a serious competitor for Google. The way Google indexes the web is very theoritical, very &#8216;mechanical&#8217;. The 100+ factors in the algorhythm decide the ranking of websites depending on the search query. The machine is the boss. Facebook is going to do the opposite. It is now possible for website owners to place a Facebook <a title="Facebook I like it button" href="http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like" target="_blank">&#8216;I like it&#8217;</a> button on their website. This way the website which is &#8216;liked&#8217; the best will get higher in the rankings. An added layer is that you see how your (Facebook) friends have interacted with the website you&#8217;re looking at. So instead of asking help of a machine (Google) with a search query you now turn to your friends (Facebook). What do they reccomend? Which websites do they like? This technique is not new (<a title="Delicious" href="http://www.delicious.com" target="_blank">delicious</a> is already doing this) but the big difference is the huge user base. Some <a title="Facebook traffice surpasses Googl" href="http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_14698296" target="_blank">sources</a> even claim that Facebook&#8217;s traffic is surpassing Google&#8217;s. This in combination with the opening up to third parties is creating a very powerfull new way to surf the web. If we now look at the Google developers shutting down their accounts in perspective it looks like a pre-emptive strike. To openly question Facebook&#8217;s privacy settings and make a public stance means the war has started. Or maybe it already started when <a title="Wired article: Great wall of Facebook" href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-07/ff_facebookwall" target="_blank">Facebook denied Google from crawling their website</a>? Anyway the next couple of years we are going to see some fireworks with Google and Facebook going head to head.</p>
<p>In the end we, the users, are always the winners because this means both parties have to be creative and innovative to obtain a loyal userbase. So I encourage this battle: Go war!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/start-of-a-new-search-engine-war-google-vs-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 the Year of the Business model</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/2009-the-year-of-the-business-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/2009-the-year-of-the-business-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YouTube, Digg and Twitter. Three great websites with a massive following. But these websites all have one big problem: They don&#8217;t know how to make money. 2009 will be the year of the business model. These three services will have to to find a way to convert all their visitors and exposure into money. Because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="YouTube" href="http://www.youtube.com" target="_blank">YouTube</a>, <a title="Digg" href="http://www.digg.com" target="_blank">Digg</a> and <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. Three great websites with a massive following. But these websites all have one big problem: They don&#8217;t know how to make money. 2009 will be the year of the business model. These three services will have to to find a way to convert all their visitors and exposure into money. Because if they can&#8217;t make money than they are useless from a commercial point of view.</p>
<p><strong>YouTube</strong><br />
Google, owner of Youtube, will have to cut it&#8217;s losses when YouTube keeps burning cash. So Google is likely to push the adwords idea through on YouTube. A sponsored video is likely to pop up on YouTube search results any time soon. We&#8217;re already seeing advertising in the actual video&#8217;s.</p>
<p><strong>Digg</strong><br />
Digg is becoming a bottomless well. Digg has 22.6 million unique monthly visitors but last year they lost 2.6 million dollar. I&#8217;m very interreseted in the way Digg will try to earn money this year. They have a very though demographic (18-35 year old males) who are not really sensitive for banner advertising.</p>
<p><strong>Twitter</strong><br />
Twitter has been booming the last year. It&#8217;s becoming mainstream and has a hard time keeping the service up and running because their servers can&#8217;t handle the load. And the infrastructure costs money. Lots of money. But don&#8217;t worry the godfather of Twitter, Evan Williams, said they have found a way to make money but he is keeping it a secret for now. Exciting. My guess is that they will start selling data. All those people are twittering about products and services, data which could be very useful for big corporations. It&#8217;s also an ideal way to find out what&#8217;s hot. If a lot of people start twittering about the same subject it&#8217;s bound to get hot.</p>
<p>As I said, 2009 has to be the year of the businnes model and making money, Else we might see some little bubbles burst again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/web-applications/2009-the-year-of-the-business-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

