<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robert Roose &#187; Near future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertroose.com/category/near-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertroose.com</link>
	<description>My Thoughts about Technology, Games and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Predictions 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/predictions-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/predictions-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a translation of the Dutch article posted on the Van Eldijk Blog.  Before I unleash my predictions on 2012 I first want to reflect on the predictions I did for 2011: The War between Google and Facebook is getting heated up With the launch of Google+, Google&#8217;s attempt for a Social Network, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a title="Voorspellingen 2012 Robert Roose" href="http://www.vaneldijk.nl/artikelen/voorspellingen-2012-robert-roose">This is a translation of the Dutch article posted on the Van Eldijk Blog.</a> </em></p>
<p>Before I unleash my predictions on 2012 I first want to reflect on the predictions I did for 2011:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>The War between Google and Facebook is getting heated up<br />
</strong>With the launch of <a title="Google +" href="http://www.google.nl/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=google%20plus&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CCgQFjAA&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fplus.google.com%2F%3Fhl%3Dnl&amp;ei=HJz9TvTnM46VOt6QlakK&amp;usg=AFQjCNGNJWoP5i-VHUlex19P4i-p1-L-jg">Google+</a>, Google&#8217;s attempt for a Social Network, the war has reached it&#8217;s boiling point. Both parties don&#8217;t cooperate anymore. They are trying to dominate as much domains as possible going head on. This prediction has come true.</li>
<li><strong>The Rise of Drupal and WordPress</strong><br />
Last year I predicted that Drupal and WordPress would see a rise in a popularity when compared to Joomla. If you look at these <a title="Google Trends Drupal WordPress Joomla" href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=wordpress%2C+joomla%2C+drupal">stats</a> this has become reality. Joomla is caught in a downwards spiral which has started to decline heavier in 2011. This, I also predicted correctly.</li>
<li><strong>HTML5 &amp; CSS3<br />
</strong>This prediction was a bit more complicated. What comes down to is that we (webdesigner) would be able to use more advanced HTML and CSS techniques because of the decline of outdated browsers (such as Internet Explorer 6). This has been the case. Microsoft is even <a title="IE6 Countdown" href="http://www.ie6countdown.com/">counting down</a> the usage of Internet Explorer 6. A good year for the webdesigner, but for me personally because all three my predictions have been spot on.</li>
</ol>
<p>And now for the real show: My predictions for 2012:</p>
<h3> 1. Apple Downhill</h3>
<p>2012 is going to be the year in which the popularity of Apple will start a decline. I don&#8217;t expect that everyone will dump any product baring the Apple logo, but there will be a increase of people who will doubt the status of Apple. With the passing of Steve Jobs there is a big gaping hole within Apple. The leader is dead, there isn&#8217;t a dictator who has the guts to make decisions. This will result in sub-par products which are the result of compromises.</p>
<p>The iPhone 4S was disappointing, but the iPad 3 won&#8217;t be revolutionary. It is going to be a little bit better and faster but that&#8217;s about it. The televisions Apple is rumored to be developing won&#8217;t be more than a Frankenstein between existing products. If we reflect on the technological advancements of 2012 at the end of this year we will see that Apple has been trumped by Amazon. Because I predict Amazon, with Jeff Bezos as visonairy, will be the new Apple.</p>
<h3>2. Webdesign is going back to basic</h3>
<p><a title="Future of Webdesign Back To Basic" href="http://www.robertroose.com/web-design/future-of-webdesign-back-to-the-basics/">I already reflected on this here.</a></p>
<h3> 3. Interactive Televisions</h3>
<p>2012 is going to be another year in which the interactive television is going to be a hot topic. For years people are trying (and failing) to create a TV which utilizes all the advantages the Internet brings us. 2012 is another year where it won&#8217;t happen. Google has been trying to get some grip on the market with Google TV, but it doesn&#8217;t look like it&#8217;s going to breakthrough in 2012. Apple is also developing a Television (as mentioned above).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about the medium. It&#8217;s about the content. Because what&#8217;s the iPod without iTunes or imagine the iPhone without the Apps. It wouldn&#8217;t have been such a big hit. It&#8217;s going to be extremely difficult to cut a good deal with the Television broadcasters. That&#8217;s why I think that 2012 is the rise and fall of the Interactive Television.</p>
<p>What do you think about my predictions? Am I on the right track or is it all bullshit? Let me know in the comments!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/predictions-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs Died: BIG DEAL!</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/steve-jobs-died-big-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/steve-jobs-died-big-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title of this post is not sarcastic. Steve Jobs dying is a very big deal. First let me say that i&#8217;m not an Apple Fanboy. Actually I&#8217;m more of an Apple Hater. I hate the way they treat their customers by crippling them with numerous restrictions (i.e.: mandatory iTunes &#38; strict policies (dis)allowing apps [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-516" title="steve" src="http://www.robertroose.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/steve1.png" alt="" width="145" height="183" /></p>
<p>The title of this post is not sarcastic. Steve Jobs dying is a very big deal.</p>
<p>First let me say that i&#8217;m not an Apple Fanboy. Actually I&#8217;m more of an Apple Hater. I hate the way they treat their customers by crippling them with numerous restrictions (i.e.: mandatory iTunes &amp; strict policies (dis)allowing apps into the app store). And I hate the way consumers blindly follow the Apple Hype without thinking twice about these restrictions.</p>
<p>That being said I do believe the passing of Steve Jobs is a great loss. Steve Jobs was NOT a visionary! He took an already existing product (such as a phone or tablet) and made it into something consumers would actually be able to buy and use. After an Apple Product announcement the whole market would be propelled and similar products would pop up everywhere. And these similar products were even better (in my opinion). A great example is the mobile operating system Android. It would have never existed if Steve didn&#8217;t shook up the market.</p>
<p>So that leaves us with a big gap. If not Steve who is able to get us forward? Tim Cook? Steve Balmer? Larry Page? I don&#8217;t think so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/steve-jobs-died-big-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The App is dead</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-app-is-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-app-is-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a year ago the Wired magazine had a fluorescent orange cover with big bold black letters claiming the web is dead. The cover article explained that surfing the web has declined the last few years. More and more people are using apps to consume content. I think we will see this flip back once [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.robertroose.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/app-is-dead.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-431" title="app-is-dead" src="http://www.robertroose.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/app-is-dead.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="167" /></a>About a year ago the Wired magazine had a fluorescent orange cover with big bold black letters claiming <a title="The Web is Dead" href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/ff_webrip/all/1" target="_blank">the web is dead</a>. The cover article explained that surfing the web has declined the last few years. More and more people are using apps to consume content. I think we will see this flip back once more. Apps will be a thing of the past and the (mobile) web will rise aigan. Here is why:</p>
<p>1. Developers are sick of the Apple App store. Months of developing can go straight into the waste basket when Apple decides your app is <a title="App Store Guidelines" href="http://developer.apple.com/appstore/guidelines.html" target="_blank">not suitable</a> for the App store. Also the <a title="The Next Web Apple App Store subscriptions Fees" href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/02/15/subscriptions-arrive-in-the-app-store/" target="_blank">subscription based fees Apple</a> is pressing on publishers won&#8217;t help the popularity of the App store.</p>
<p>2. <a title="ZDNet Android Fragmentation Article" href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/androids-biggest-worry-fragmentation/8022" target="_blank">Fragmentation</a> (a big problem with Android Apps). Not everyone Android phone has the system requirements to run the latest version of Android. Meaning older phones running older Android versions. This makes it hard for a developer to keep his app up to date for all the different versions.</p>
<p>3. New uses for existing technologies, such as <a title="HTML5 Rocks" href="http://www.html5rocks.com/en/" target="_blank">HTML5</a> and <a title="Responsive Webdesign" href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/" target="_blank">Responsive webdesign</a>, to create compelling online experiences. With these technologies it is easy to create a website which works on every device and screen size.</p>
<p>In the future we will see developers bypassing apps and app stores to create just one centralized web app which plays nice with all modern devices. This shift is already visible with Facebook <a title="TechCrunch Article about Facebook Project Spartan" href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/15/facebook-project-spartan/" target="_blank">creating it&#8217;s own web app platform</a>, they don&#8217;t feel like bowing down to the App store overlords.</p>
<p>In the end the demise of the app will be a lot easier for the developer freeing up time to innovate instead of troubling with App store dictators or fiddling with backwards compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-app-is-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future is Boring</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-future-is-boring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-future-is-boring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last decade has brought us some amazing technologies and web apps. Starting with Google, a way to find information on the web we have never seen before! Then came Wikipedia, collective sharing of knowledge all around the world. Followed by social networks such as Facebook, a revolutionary tool to connect to your social networks. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last decade has brought us some amazing technologies and web apps. Starting with <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Google</a>, a way to find information on the web we have never seen before! Then came <a title="Wikipedia" href="http://www.wikipedia.org" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>, collective sharing of knowledge all around the world. Followed by social networks such as <a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, a revolutionary tool to connect to your social networks. The rise of the mobile web soon followed with <a title="Android" href="http://www.android.com/" target="_blank">Android</a> and the <a title="iPhone" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" target="_blank">iPhone</a>.</p>
<p>And then it became less exciting. We got <a title="Twitter" href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> which is OK but not mind blowing. <a title="Foursquare" href="http://www.foursquare.com" target="_blank">Foursquare</a>&#8230; share where you are and&#8230; right, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to me (yet). And the big thing this year is <a title="Groupon" href="http://www.groupon.com" target="_blank">Groupon</a>. Groupon is nothing more than a coupon website! How more boring can it be? It&#8217;s like we&#8217;ve teleported five decades where everybody still clipped the coupons out of the local newspaper! Of course I understand it&#8217;s probably a huge hit (mainly because it&#8217;s one of the few sites actually found a working financial model) but you can hardly call it a revolution. It doesn&#8217;t move me. It feels like I&#8217;m chewing on the same piece of gum the last few years&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for something spectacular! <a title="Fly Nanon" href="http://www.flynano.com/" target="_blank">Flying Cars</a> anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-future-is-boring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Start of a new War: Google vs Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/start-of-a-new-search-engine-war-google-vs-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/start-of-a-new-search-engine-war-google-vs-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once there was a war between the search engines. We all know who the won that war: Google. We can hardly remember what we used before Google (Altavista? Yahoo?). A new war is raging. Facebook is stepping up and is putting the pressure on Google. But it&#8217;s Google throwing the first punch. Last week a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once there was a war between the search engines. We all know who the won that war: Google. We can hardly remember what we used before Google (<a title="Altavista" href="http://www.altavista.com/" target="_blank">Altavista</a>? <a title="Yahoo" href="http://www.yahoo.com" target="_blank">Yahoo</a>?). A new war is raging. Facebook is stepping up and is <a title="Facebook putting the pressure on Google" href="http://gigaom.com/2010/04/20/facebook-takes-over-the-web/" target="_blank">putting the pressure</a> on Google. But it&#8217;s Google throwing the first punch.</p>
<p>Last week a lot of <a title="Google Software Engineers deactivated their Facebook accounts" href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2010/04/23/privacy-issues-google-engineers-leaving-facebook-in-droves/" target="_blank">Google  Software Engineers deactivated their Facebook accounts</a>. This exodus started because of to the announcement on Facebook&#8217;s F8 conference concerning the change in privacy settings. Facebook is opening up to third party sites (such as <a title="Yelp" href="http://www.yelp.com/" target="_blank">Yelp</a>) to make your surfing a more personal experience. This move by Google&#8217;s employees is interesting because the whole things looks orchestrated. Is this a spontaneous reaction or were these Google workers encouraged?</p>
<p>The decision by Facebook to open up is making the social website a serious competitor for Google. The way Google indexes the web is very theoritical, very &#8216;mechanical&#8217;. The 100+ factors in the algorhythm decide the ranking of websites depending on the search query. The machine is the boss. Facebook is going to do the opposite. It is now possible for website owners to place a Facebook <a title="Facebook I like it button" href="http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/plugins/like" target="_blank">&#8216;I like it&#8217;</a> button on their website. This way the website which is &#8216;liked&#8217; the best will get higher in the rankings. An added layer is that you see how your (Facebook) friends have interacted with the website you&#8217;re looking at. So instead of asking help of a machine (Google) with a search query you now turn to your friends (Facebook). What do they reccomend? Which websites do they like? This technique is not new (<a title="Delicious" href="http://www.delicious.com" target="_blank">delicious</a> is already doing this) but the big difference is the huge user base. Some <a title="Facebook traffice surpasses Googl" href="http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_14698296" target="_blank">sources</a> even claim that Facebook&#8217;s traffic is surpassing Google&#8217;s. This in combination with the opening up to third parties is creating a very powerfull new way to surf the web. If we now look at the Google developers shutting down their accounts in perspective it looks like a pre-emptive strike. To openly question Facebook&#8217;s privacy settings and make a public stance means the war has started. Or maybe it already started when <a title="Wired article: Great wall of Facebook" href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-07/ff_facebookwall" target="_blank">Facebook denied Google from crawling their website</a>? Anyway the next couple of years we are going to see some fireworks with Google and Facebook going head to head.</p>
<p>In the end we, the users, are always the winners because this means both parties have to be creative and innovative to obtain a loyal userbase. So I encourage this battle: Go war!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/start-of-a-new-search-engine-war-google-vs-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the iPad kill the website?</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/will-the-ipad-kill-the-purpose-of-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/will-the-ipad-kill-the-purpose-of-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the introduction of the iPad a new device is added into our (already heavy) backpack. Is this device going to change the future of websites? Are websites doomed as claimed by Boris in his post on thenextweb.com? Boris thinks websites will be replaced by Apps. I beg to differ. I don&#8217;t think it is about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the introduction of the <a title="iPad" href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/" target="_blank">iPad</a> a new device is added into our (already heavy) backpack. Is this device going to change the future of websites? Are websites doomed as claimed by <a title="Boris of the Next Web" href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/author/boris/" target="_blank">Boris</a> in <a title="Death of the website" href="http://thenextweb.com/apple/author/boris/" target="_self">his post on thenextweb.com</a>? Boris thinks websites will be replaced by Apps. I beg to differ. I don&#8217;t think it is about the device, the App or the website. I thinks it&#8217;s about data and services. I don&#8217;t care if I have to use an App or a website as long as I get to do the things I want to do WHERE I want to do them. For example if I want to check <a title="The Internet Movie Database" href="http://www.imdb.com" target="_blank">IMDB</a> on my phone I would like to use an App, but if I want to check it on my laptop I would rather use the website. The App or website is just a tool, not the goal. The goal is to get information as quickly as possible.</p>
<p>More likely future websites will have added layers enabling Voice Control or simplified touch controls. Making websites easier to use on the iPad and future iPad competitors without compromising experience for users viewing the website in an ordinary browser. Because it will take a very long time for the iPad (or any similair iPad-like device) to become a household product. Take a look at the penitration of smartphones. In 2009 only <a title="Smartphone penetration" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/comscore-smartphone-penetration-marketshare-feb-2010.jpg" target="_blank">17%</a> of every mobile phone was a smartphone. Offering your data and services merely through Apps won&#8217;t cut it! You still need a website to please the biggest share of users. Websites are not dead, they are ready for their second life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/will-the-ipad-kill-the-purpose-of-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new newspaper</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-new-newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-new-newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AideRSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illiad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspapers are having a though time. Circulation is declining , ads are declining and worst of all there seems to be less and less audience. Needless to say it&#8217;s time for something new. In this post I will introduce a system combining existing technologies which, in my opinion, is the new newspaper. The device Paper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspapers are having a though time. <a title="Newspaper circulation is declining" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/02/AR2005050201457.html">Circulation is declining </a>, <a title="Newspaper ads are declining" href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/08/31/newspapers-advertising-media-biz-media-cx_lh_0831newspapers.html">ads are declining</a> and worst of all <a title="Newspaper audience decline" href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/04/28/newspaper-audience-decline-again-no-end-till-zero-2/">there seems to be less and less audience</a>. Needless to say it&#8217;s time for something new. In this post I will introduce a system combining existing technologies which, in my opinion, is the new newspaper.</p>
<h4>The device</h4>
<p><img style="float: left; padding-right: 10px; border-style: solid; boder-width: 1px; border-color: #fff; padding-top: 5px;" src="http://www.robertroose.com/img/posts/amazon-kindle.jpg" alt="Amazon Kindle" />Paper is a good medium. It&#8217;s easy to read articles on paper and it&#8217;s very portable. But it is a bitch to update. Newspapers have to put out a new version almost daily. Currently there are devices on the market which are easy on the eyes and portable as well. Such as the <a title="The Amazon Kindle" href="http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-Amazons-Wireless-Reading-Device/dp/B000FI73MA">Amazon Kindle</a>. Although the reviews <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/11/amazoncom-says.html">aren&#8217;t great</a> this device offers the basic functionality needed for the New Newspaper (the more costly <a href="http://www.irextechnologies.com/products/iliad">iRex Illiad</a> could do the trick as well). It&#8217;s portable, easy to read and updating the content is simple, which I will get to next.</p>
<h4>The content</h4>
<p>The user needs to decide when the content will be updated. This could be every minute, hour, day, week, etcetera. This is possible through the Wireless internet access which is available on the Kindle as well as on the iRex Illiad. Making use of RSS Feeds the user can select all the news sites he or she wants to follow.</p>
<p>For example: I want to follow at least 100 websites posting around 5 posts a day. I add the feeds to a newsreader like <a href="http://www.google.com/reader">Google Reader</a>. But I don&#8217;t have time to read 500 articles a day. I only want the most valuable news and not waste any time on uninteresting articles. This is where <a href="http://www.aiderss.com/">AideRSS</a> comes in. By implementing AideRSS in your Google Reader I&#8217;m able to filter posts. I can set my own filter level if I want more or less articles. The same way as traditional newspapers filter all the incoming news and only publish the best. Only this time I&#8217;ve selected my own sources, the news is specified to my own taste. All you have to do is <a href="http://thepugetnews.com/2008/04/29/using-google-reader-on-the-amazon-kindle/">hook up your Kindle to Google Reader.</a></p>
<h4>Bonus: The Form</h4>
<p>And, if you are a bit nostalgic, you can even use the traditional form. The application <a href="http://www.acrylicapps.com/times/">Times</a> takes your feeds and puts them in a traditional newspaper format. This enhances scanning articles and makes it easier to read. Too bad it&#8217;s only available for the Mac at the moment. So it&#8217;s waiting for someone to port it to the Kindle or Iliad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/the-new-newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Mashup: IMDB &amp; DVD</title>
		<link>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/tech-mashup-imdb-dvd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/tech-mashup-imdb-dvd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Roose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Near future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technogloy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertroose.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Problem: I&#8217;m watching a DVD with my girlfriend. An actor enters the scene and my brain wakes up. I know this guy from another movie but for the love of god I can&#8217;t remember which one. For the next couple of minutes I&#8217;m wreckhing my brain ignoring the plot of the movie. Eventually I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>The Problem:</h4>
<p>I&#8217;m watching a DVD with my girlfriend. An actor enters the scene and my brain wakes up. I know this guy from another movie but for the love of god I can&#8217;t remember which one. For the next couple of minutes I&#8217;m wreckhing my brain ignoring the plot of the movie. Eventually I give in, pause the movie, dodge the evil eye of my girlfriend, boot my computer and go to IMDB. The “AHA” moment is satasfying but now I have to rewind the movie.</p>
<h4>The Solution:</h4>
<p>An integration of a DVD with IMDB. As soon as this mystery actor or actress appears you can retrieve their IMDB details with the push of a button. You don&#8217;t have to pause the movie because you get a simple overview in a small seperate screen which you can easily turn off. Of course you want your DVD player to be connected to the tubes of the interweb delivering real-time data, but for now I think settling for (static) data to be retrieved from the DVD a more realistic option.</p>
<h4>How it could work:</h4>
<p>Below I have made some screens detailing the way it could work.<br />
You see an actor you want to know more about and you hit the IMDB button:<br />
<img src="http://www.robertroose.com/img/posts/imdb-dvd-iron-man-01.jpg" alt="Imdb integration DVD Iron Man" /></p>
<p>And when you click on Robert Downey Jr.:<br />
<img src="http://www.robertroose.com/img/posts/imdb-dvd-iron-man-02.jpg" alt="Imdb integration DVD Iron Man" width="600" height="400" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robertroose.com/near-future/tech-mashup-imdb-dvd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

